News

Home/News/

Morning Summary

U.S. stocks are down slightly this morning as macro traders  digest headlines from over the weekend that China has cuts it’s economic growth target. The Chinese government however emphatically denies any rumors of a “hard-landing”. Crude continues to gain traction and is now trading at multi-month highs.  Emerging market equities just chalked up their biggest weekly gains since 2011. It’s also worth noting that both gold and iron ore, though down slightly this morning, are up nearly +20% on the year. All of which has some inside the trade arguing that the commodity markets have bottomed. Bottom-line, I suspect as oil stabilizes investors are going to continue to feel more at ease with adding “risk”. There seems to be more talk about the overall economic landscape becoming much more highly “fragmented” rather than negative across the board. In other words some pockets or areas of the economy are seeing sharp declines and have clearly moved into recessionary territory, while other areas remain strong and robust. Many analyst believe this is why the markets have become extremely difficult to forecast. It seems like whatever direction the  headlines and lights on the stage decide to shine can produce wildly different results. One thing for certain, we are finally seeing more sizable cuts in U.S. oil production as rig counts drop below 400. Keep in mind, U.S. crude production had jumped from just 5.4 million barrels a day back in early-2010 to a whopping 9.7 million barrels per day this past spring. We are also seeing more headlines about Saudi Arabia looking to borrow $10 billion dollars and talk their government may be starting to feel the pain of cheap oil. Russia is also talking more openly about possible production cuts. Here at home this week economic data will be very light, today’s only release being the Labor Market Conditions Index, which isn’t heavily watched by investors but seems to be  something the Federal Reserve officials monitor. Keep in mind the jobs report this past Friday was extremely strong, showing employers added +242,000 jobs in February, well above market consensus. The government also revised upward its estimates for job gains in December and January by a total of +30,000. The negatives in the report were a -0.1% decline in hourly wages and a slight reduction in weekly hours worked. I suspect the main event this week will be the European Central Bank’s latest policy decision, which will be announced on Thursday morning. The trade is expecting the ECB to move rates further into negative territory. Keep in mind that the whole “negative rate experiment” is eyed with a high degree of anxiety as investors and economists alike aren’t sure what the ultimate consequences might be. While central bank stimulus has historically been viewed by Wall Street as a positive, the deeper move into negative territory may not illicit that traditional response. It doesn’t help that the ECB’s stimulus efforts have so far failed to prop up their waning economy, as just last week data showed the the EU block has slid back into “deflation.” Analysts are also expecting the ECB to increase its bond buying by […]

By |2016-03-07T11:22:01-06:00March 7th, 2016|Articles, Newsletter|0 Comments

Is China Challenging To Be The World’s Breadbasket?

If you want to look to the future of food production, its important to look at the trends in crop breeding technology, specifically at the countries with the most patent activity. According to research from Thomson Reuters and their “9 Billion Bowls” project, a research piece I encourage everyone to read in full-detail, China is making a bold push to be the world’s breadbasket of the future, perhaps within the next decade. As it stand now the U.S. and China alone represent 68% of all the patent documents associated with crop breeding around the world. From what I understand these two countries are larger than the closet competing country by at least a factor of five. However, it’s notable that while the U.S. has more patent applications over the past 5 years than China, the majority of the U.S. documents are coming from a small collection of private companies, while the Chinese applications are coming from a larger number of academic institutions. Once China’s private industry begins patenting, there is a high likelihood that they will pass the U.S. in the number of crop breeding patent applications produced. Based on the recent filing data, it’s clear that China has taken a a more aggressive interest in crop breeding and is using these innovations to position themselves not only to meet the needs of their own domestic population, but to potentially challenge the U.S. as the “Breadbasket of the World.” This is a terrific bit of research and there’s a lot more interesting data worth digesting. You can see form the information that the Thompson Reuters team has put a lot of time and research into this study and have certainly delivered a quality report. (Source: Thomson Reuters, 9 Billion Bowls)

WW Crop Breeding Patents

By |2016-03-02T11:17:29-06:00March 2nd, 2016|Uncategorized|0 Comments

Too many cooks in the advocacy kitchen? (commentary)

By Kelsey Faivre                                                                                                        February 19, 2016

A friend of mine mentioned that an agriculture professional came to speak with one of her on-campus organizations a while ago, bringing the message that every person involved in agriculture should be actively blogging and participating in social media “agvocacy” efforts. That’s a pretty common message in agriculture circles today.

Despite hearing this message, my friend still hasn’t started up a blog. Her reasoning?

“I’m not that good of a writer. I like plants, not writing, and I don’t have the time it takes to find accurate scientific information to back up my ideas. I don’t want to muddy the waters for people by contributing to an effort in a way that creates more confusion than good.”

That got me thinking. There’s no question that there is a need to educate consumers on the ways of modern agriculture. But I wonder if relative quality of advocacy messages may have an impact on consumer response and therefore the success of efforts to increase overall agriculture literacy.

It seems like everywhere you turn, agriculturalists are being encouraged to tell their stories, to be “agvocates.” In my opinion, it’s time to think a little harder about the ways we champion agriculture.

How can we advocate while recognizing our limitations of expertise?

Each individual in the agriculture industry has a different perspective and a different story to tell. But nobody is an expert on every topic! It seems like sometimes we are quick to jump to the defense of our fellow farmers, even if we don’t know all the facts about their segment of the industry. This creates confusion.

A good example of this is when some agvocates try to defend gestation stalls but confuse them with farrowing crates. This creates more of a problem, requiring experts to step in and try to provide clarification. In the resulting confusion, both the misinformed agvocates and the swine experts risk losing credibility and the industry seems like it can’t agree on a message.

Are we leaving room for more than one right answer?

The agriculture industry is not homogenous. People down the road from each other growing the same crops may make completely different management decisions for equally legitimate reasons. That’s something to celebrate and share. Advocating for a single production method while simultaneously discrediting those who use others creates confusion and resentment within the industry.

Is advocating badly more damaging than no advocacy at all?

I’m not sure there’s a right answer to this question. On one hand, there are a lot of cooks in the “agvocacy” kitchen. On the other, each of us has a different agriculture story and a different perspective, and there should be room for those in the conversation about food and farming.

Agvocacy efforts are fantastic and necessary. But are there times when inaccurate information, lack of scientific grasp, and/or difficulty communicating clearly makes for poor execution. Is it possible that it’s to the detriment of the industry? Certainly something worth pondering I would say.

Faivre was raised on a farm in Northern Illinois, where […]

By |2016-02-22T08:41:54-06:00February 22nd, 2016|Articles|0 Comments

Grain Market Update

Corn prices are slightly higher this morning on the heels of a small rebound in wheat and soybeans. There’s really no fresh news to report following the extend weekend, the weather in South America remains mostly benign, the Chinese continue to sit on a glut of corn as their reserve price remains in question, and the trade continues to believe the USDA will soon announce that they see more corn acres being planted here in the U.S. during 2016. From both a spec and technical perspective it seems really hard for me to imagine old-crop prices in the MAR16 contract moving beyond the $3.70 to $3.80 area based on the current circumstances and headlines. Sure I could argue that we will see more of a short-covering rally in the entire commodity sector if crude oil can continue to find its legs and move more aggressively north of $30 per barrel, but I suspect that’s only money sloshing around and does very little to change or alter the overall current bearish fundamentals that are still entrenched in this market. As for new-crop prices, I still argue that the DEC16 contract will continue to find extremely heavy resistance up between the $3.95 to $4.10 area. As a producer who is wanting to reduce more new-crop risk, I simply remain patient! Personally I’m targeting the late-March to early-May time period as our next bullish window of opportunity. A period of time where I suspect many of the current cards on the table are reshuffled and U.S. weather starts to more aggressively move to the forefront… Moral of the story, despite the possibilities of small nearby bounce on increased crude oil optimism and temporary commodity short-covering, I continue to keep hedges place fearing we could still see another round of lower prices within the next 30-days.

Spring Crop Revenue Insurance Guarantees: Remember these prices will update daily during the month of February as the price average is determined.

  • Corn $3.87^6 (Avg. close of the DEC16 contract during Feb)
  • Soybeans $8.85^4 (Avg. close of the NOV16 contract during Feb)

Soybeans bulls are hoping the trade can somehow gather enough momentum into a wave of bearish fundamentals to overcome the heavy resistance on the charts up between $8.90 and $9.10 per bushel. It’s hard for me to imagine this market breaking-out beyond these levels with the South American crop continuing to advance without any major widespread disruptions. The recent rainfall totals in Argentina have helped production in many key locations, while the Brazilian harvest continuing to advance with more reports circulating of better than expected yields. Traders will be eager this week to see how the Chinese crush margins respond now that we have moved past the week long Lunar New Year holiday. As for U.S. headlines, traders are patiently waiting to see what the USDA has to say late next week at their 2016 Ag Outlook Forum. Early thoughts remain +1 to +2 million more soybean acres being planted in 2016, with an average yield starting out somewhere between 46.5 and 47.5 bushels per acre….neither of which are considered bullish! As both a spec and a producer I clearly […]

By |2016-02-16T10:07:44-06:00February 16th, 2016|Uncategorized|0 Comments

Midwest Gas Price Decline Leads Nation Average Lower

Another week, another decline at the gas pump for much of the country. Gasoline prices fell 6.2 cents in the last week, according to GasBuddy.com live data. The national average stood $1.74/gallon yesterday, some -25.6 cents lower than last month and -44.4 cents below last year’s prices. No where in the country has the decline been as large as in the Midwest, where refiners have continued to churn out cheap winter gasoline. In just the last week, average prices in Indiana, Michigan and Ohio fell 14 cents per gallon, while some stations in these states fell over -30 cents per gallon. Over half the states in the country have seen gas prices decline over -20 cents in the last month, while the Great Lakes and West Coast sit atop the list: Indiana, Illinois, Ohio and Michigan saw declines of 41-43 cents, while California, Oregon and Washington saw declines of 36-37 cents. Nationwide, just 13.1% of gas stations are selling over $2 per gallon while over 25% now are selling under $1.50 per gallon. (Source: Gas Buddy) Gas Near $1.00 Per Gallon In Some Parts Of The U.S. – There are at least eight states where some stations are now selling gas for less than $1.25 a gallon, according to GasBuddy.com. The cheapest gas at the moment is at a 7-Eleven in Oklahoma City, which is selling a gallon of regular for $1.11. In fact, more than a dozen other stations in that city have gas for $1.14 or less. Extremely cheap gas can also be found in Texas, Missouri, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois Michigan and Kansas. Nationwide, the average price of a gallon of regular is down to $1.74, the cheapest it’s been since early January 2009. Read more at CNN Money

Cheapest States for Gasoline

 

By |2016-02-09T07:39:26-06:00February 9th, 2016|Uncategorized|0 Comments
Go to Top